The Revolution takes Rome

September 5, 2016

So let’s back up a bit.  A conspiracy was formed, we do not know exactly when but probably sometime in either the late seventeenth or early eighteenth century, to overthrow the Christian order and to erase the Gospel from the memory of the human race.  The spirit of lawlessness, as Saint Paul calls it, has been there since the beginning but something happened in the decades that followed the Thirty Years War that began to focus and organize wickedness in a way unknown to prior ages.

Rather than launching a bold frontal assault on the Church with their seductive but bad ideas as the enemies of old had done they hid in secret places and began to organize themselves.  They hated authority and discipline but had learned to discipline their own personal passions for the sake of inflaming the passions of others and to adopt the virtue of patience and of obedience to unknown superiors in order to achieve their malicious ends.  They wished only to destroy, but first they had to create institutions of their own which were capable of facing up to and annihilating the institutions which had given life to Catholic civilization; i.e. the Catholic Church.  We have chronicled that process on this website.

We have seen these men conspire to seduce the Bourbon kings into forcing the Pope to suppress the Society of Jesus who were the Church’s and the Catholic kings’ best defense against the marauding wave of anarchy that these men intended to unleash on the world.

We have seen their successors seize control of the French state and turn that power towards the ruin of the Catholic Church and of the French monarchy and monarchy in general.  And now they turned their greedy eyes to Rome, to the city and its church who had once upon a time given birth to the very kingdoms they were trying to destroy.

When General Berthier’s army marched on Rome Pope Pius VI knew that it would be useless to resist as there was no chance of success.  In order to prevent the useless spilling of blood he ordered his soldiers to give way to the army of the French Republic.  On February 15, 1798 General Berthier entered Rome without any opposition.  He made a show of being ‘invited’ into the city by a deputation of ‘roman citizens’ bearing an olive crown who were nothing but paid French agents.  He then went to the Capitol and made this proclamation as translated and reported by the London Evening Mail on March 9, 1798:

The Roman people are restored to their rights of Sovereignty by proclaiming their independence, by assuming the Government of Ancient Rome, and by constituting the Roman Republic.  The General in Chief of the French Army in Italy declares, in the name of the French Republic, that he acknowledges the independent Roman Republic, and that it is under the special protection of the French arms.  The General in Chief also acknowledges, in the name of the French Republic, the Provisional Government chosen by the Roman People.  All temporal authorities proceeding from the Pope are therefore suppressed, and shall exercise no functions whatever.  The General in Chief shall make every disposition necessary to secure the independence of the Roman People, and to perfect the organization of their Government, in order that their new laws may be founded on the basis of Liberty and Equality.  He will adopt every measure calculate to improve the happiness of the Romans.  The French General Cervoni is charged with the direction of the Police, and providing for the security of the City of Rome; and also the installation of the new Government. The Roman Republic acknowledged by the French Republic, comprehends all the territory which remained under the temporal authority of the Pope after the Treaty of Campo Formio.

The first thing I want to note is this: there it is again!  liberty and equality but fraternity is absolutely nowhere to be found.  This is extremely important and God willing I will show why in a later post.

So the Pope, Pius VI, is stripped of all of his political power, power which he never sought but was entrusted to him as a duty and a duty that weighed him down all the days of his long reign.  He had been on the papal throne for exactly twenty three years the day that temporal power was stripped form him.  At the time he was the longest serving Pope since Saint Peter.  He was old now and his body weak and he had fallen into the hands of his enemies.

But what would they do with him?  Would they erect a guillotine in Saint Peter’s Square and be done with him like Louis XVI?  Not quite.  The Papacy is very old, we forget how old the Papacy is.  I wonder how many tourists visiting the ancient and dilapidated ruins of the Colosseum in Rome after seeing the Holy Father give his Angelus address and blessing the crowd on a Sunday or Holy Day realize that there was actually already a Pope in Rome before Vespasian even conceived of the idea to build that same Colosseum with the spoils and slaves he gained in the war that crushed the Jewish revolt in Palestine?  That is how old the Papacy is and it has seen a thing or two in its time.  Popes had had their heads cut off before and it had done nothing but, after an initial shock, strengthen the Faith.  They weren’t interested in making a martyr but in destroying the Papacy itself.  So what to do?

First they went to Pius VI and told him that he didn’t rule anything anymore and was to be stripped of his titles and coat of arms.  He was told that he was now a citizen of the so called Roman Republic.  They offered him the cocarde (a kind of ribbon warn by revolutionaries to signify their devotion to the republican form of government) of the new Roman Republic and told to wear it.  Jacques Crétineau-Joly gives us his response (translation mine):

I know no other uniform for myself than that with which the Church has honored me.  You have all power over my body, but my soul is beyond your reach.  I have no need of a pension.  A club instead of a stick and a rough habit suffices for one who is to expire under hatred and over ashes.  I worship the hand of the Almighty who strikes the shepherd and the flock.  You can destroy the houses of the living and the tombs of the dead, but Religion is eternal.  She will exist after you as she existed before you, and her reign will perpetuate until the end of time.

Well said your Holiness, well said.  And Pope Pius VI would live these words out.  We should all recall this attitude whenever we are confronted with the antichrists who multiply with such fervor during our own time, especially if we happen to be alive when the last one shows up.

But what would the revolution do?  They expected this refusal of course.  At four o’clock in the morning on February 20, 1798 Pope Pius VI was marched into exile.

Please go to Confession and say three Hail Marys in honor of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Posted in conspiracy to destroy the teaching of Jesus Christ, The French Revolution | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A convenient pretext: the death of General Duphot

August 24, 2016                                                                                                                                     The Feast of Saint Bartholomew, Apostle

As the autumn of 1797 progressed the revolutionary movement that had taken over France continued to fan the flames of revolt in the Papal States through its own agents and the diplomatic missions of the French Republic.  Jacques Crétineau-Joly reports that on October 10, 1797 the French Directory in Paris sent the following instructions to Joseph Bonaparte, brother of the future First Consul and Emperor of France, its ambassador to the Court of Rome (translation mine):

You have two things to do: 1) To prevent the king of Naples from coming to Rome; 2) to help to encourage the good dispositions of those who would think that it is time that the reign of the Popes came to an end; in one word to encourage the fervor that the people of Rome seem to take toward liberty.

The first instruction is obvious.  No foreign help for the Pope to help stabilize the situation.  Given the dire position of the temporal authority of the Pope in 1797 rumors were flying that he would give his temporal authority to the King of Naples in order to better retain his personal liberty.  The second instruction was to foment a revolutionary and chaotic mood in the city of Rome.  This seems rather commonplace, even prosaic, to us who live in the twenty first century.  We merely have to look back to the Comintern, to the Nazi campaign of intimidation prior to its conquest of certain countries, to all of the shenanigans of the Cold War, and even very recently to 2011 to what was called by the curious name the ‘Arab Spring’ to see embassies and other diplomatic missions used either as quiet or rather open bases for the subversion and overthrow of foreign governments.  In the eighteenth century and even into the nineteenth though this tactic was a shock.  Crétineau-Joly expresses a good deal of surprise that men who had been of such a “sacred character” as an ambassador would allow themselves to be turned into “agents of riots.”

So events proceeded and a state of permanent riot evolved in Rome throughout the next months.  On December 28, 1797 another of these manufactured riots occurred and the pretext arrived with the death of a twenty-eight year old French General Léonard-Mathurin Duphot.  A letter penned by Joseph Bonaparte to the French Foreign Minister published in Bell’s Weekly Messenger in London on January 21, 1798 describes a scene where a mob was fleeing Papal fusiliers and burst into the French embassy for protection.  Duphot supposedly charged the bayonets of the Papal soldiers with a drawn sword and fell protecting the mob.  That is not what happened.

Here I will use the description of events given by Cardinal Ercole Consalvi, a minister of Pius VI who would later go on to be a famous diplomat in the coming decades, in his memoir (translation mine):

This young man, an ardent and great republican, attempted to provoke a revolt in Rome to overthrow the pontifical government.  Around five hundred people had gathered under the windows of the French ambassador (who was named Joseph and was brother to General Bonaparte) crying: Liberty, long live the French Republic, down with the Pope!  Duphot didn’t hesitate to come down to put himself at their head and lead them to assault the closest post of soldiers: that of Ponte-Sisto.


Picture of the Tiber River and Saint Peter’s Basilica taken from the Ponte-Sisto by me in May, 2013

The soldiers there at first held back; but seeing themselves insulted and attacked and not finding safety they advanced against the mob.  They did not give way, the soldiers felt themselves in an unfortunate position; one of them got off a shot.  Fate, or rather Providence in its hidden designs, wanted this sole shot to reach General Duphot in the middle of this multitude, placed in front, and struck him dead.  The frightened people disbanded, and the body was buried the following day.

And just in case you think that Cardinal Consalvi’s report was biased, here is the report on the incident that Joseph Bonaparte’s successor as French ambassador to the Holy See, François Cacault, wrote to then First Consul Napoleon Bonaparte in May, 1801 (translation mine):

You know, as well as I, the details of this deplorable event.  No one in Rome gave an order to shoot and kill anyone:  the general was foolish, let’s cut to the chase: he was guilty.

But it didn’t matter.  The French government declared that the general was murdered, assassinated, and that war was on.  Even today on the extremely rare occasions when this event is spoken of in historical circles it is referred to as the “murder of General Duphot”; even the current very short French Wikipedia article on General Duphot states that he died assassiné le 28 décembre 1797 à Rome.  But he wasn’t murdered.  He was leading an assault on armed soldiers of the legitimate government of a place who merely tried to protect themselves and was killed in the process.  This man provoked his own death.  He was not assassinated .  But like I said it didn’t matter.  They had their pretext and war was on.

Joseph Bonaparte left Rome the next day despite being offered every protection by the Papal government.  He arrived back in Paris on January 24 according to the London Morning Post And Gazeteer of February 1, 1798.  On January 22 the French Council of the Five Hundred took the oath of hatred to Royalty in commemoration of the anniversary of the guillotining of King Louis XVI, and General Berthier’s army in Italy marched on Rome to unseat the Pope.

Please go to Confession and pray three Hail Marys in honor of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Posted in The French Revolution, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Prelude to the assault on Rome

August 9, 2016                                                                                                                                     The Memorial of Saint Teresa Benedicta of the Cross (née Edith Stein)

Now on to the greatest unremembered story of the last 500 years.  What the revolutionary government that had taken over France tried to do to Rome and to the Pope and their miraculous restoration has been almost completely wiped from the memory of the West and from Catholics in particular.  Using Jacques Crétineau-Joly’s 1859 work L’Église Romaine en face de la Révolution and whatever other more contemporary sources I can find we will tell that story.

Already before they had murdered the French king the revolutionary government of France was at work trying to unseat Pope Pius VI, first from his political and ultimately from his spiritual throne.  Think of what you are about to read as a foreshadowing of all the havoc that the Comintern and the Communist Party wreaked on the world following its formation a few decades later and especially after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 since the same group or groups working in the shadows have been fueling all of this.

Crétineau-Joly reports that on the 13th of January, 1793 the first attempt was made to foment insurrection in Rome.  Two French citizens, Flotte and Bassville, secretaries to the French legation in the Kingdom of Naples, tried to provoke the people of Rome to an uprising against the Pope.  The crowd they had gathered however turned on them and Bassville fell mortally wounded and repenting he confessed the whole hairbrained plot before he expired.  The time was not right yet.

The chaos of the French Convention had subsided and something called the Directory took over the French government.  This was a chaotic oligarchy who could rightly be called the world’s first atheistic government as they made it a priority to enforce that calendar we discussed a few posts ago in order to rid the world of Sunday.  A then little known officer named Napoleon Bonaparte was chosen to command the armies that were to invade Italy in 1796.  The ultimate target of this invasion was to be the Holy See.  The Pope was going to be dethroned and the Bride of Christ was to wither headless on the vine, or so they thought.

Bonaparte’s forces were victorious time and again and he neared Rome and was even at its gates.  The Directory back in Paris was egging him on demanding in public that Pius VI retract all of the Bulls he had written against the French Civil Constitution of the Clergy.  This was amusing and hypocritical since the French government had long ago imposed unbelief as the religion of France and had done away with any institutional church in France, constitutional or otherwise.  But it served a PR purpose as we might say today.

Bonaparte on the other hand for whatever reason had no interest in sacking Rome or deposing the Pope.  It would be hard to call the French general an ardent Catholic but he did not possess anything like the implacable hatred for the Church that the conspirators back in Paris had.  He signed a treaty with the Holy See, the treaty of Tolentino, that impoverished the Papal States but left the Holy Father free to do as he wished within the city.

The Directory was outraged, but what could they do?  He was their most successful general just having come off a series of smashing victories so they could not just cut off his head and be done with him.  So instead they promoted him and sent him off to invade Egypt while they waited for an opportunity to resume the war against the Holy Father.

Crétineau-Joly reports that all through 1797 the French republican commissaires were whipping up the army in Italy to an anti-religious frenzy to fan the flames of their desire to despoil Rome.  Note again the similarity between the French word commissaire and the later Soviet term commissar and note the similarity of their functions.  It is not an accident that these things keep reappearing.

French republican agents were all over Rome scrawling graffiti and singing songs.  The bloody anthem the Carmagnole from 1793 in Paris was sung in the streets of the center of what had been Christendom.  Crétineau-Joly gives us this interesting tidbit of some of the grafitti in Italian here:

Non abbiamo patienza,                            We will not be patient
Non vogliamo piu eminenza,                 We don’t want any more eminences
Non vogliamo Santita,                              We don’t want Holiness
Ma egualianza e liberia                             But equality and liberty

There they are again: equality and liberty but NO FRATERNITY!  This is important and you will, God willing, see why in a later post.  This theme has been echoed for 250 long years:  We don’t want (H)oliness, we just want what we want even if it will destroy us.  Or as the late Jim Morrison, God rest his soul,  would sing in 1968:

We want the world and we want it now!

Words have a history, they don’t just come out of thin air.  The Directory was laying the groundwork and waiting for a pretext.  And that pretext would come.

Please go to Confession and pray three Hail Marys in honor of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Posted in conspiracy to destroy the teaching of Jesus Christ, The 18th century, The French Revolution | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

To annihilate the Holy See

August 2, 2016                                                                                                                                       The Memorial of Saint Eusebis of Vercelli

So the conspiracy to destroy the teaching of Jesus Christ that had been midwifed by the Masonic lodges and the mischief of Voltaire had now seized control of the French state.  They had destroyed monarchy in that country and had murdered the French king.  They had despoiled the Church in France and done their best to drive religion and even the memory of Sunday from the people of that unfortunate land.  But France was only one country and they had far bigger goals.

Their goal was to erase the memory of the Gospel from the mind of man across the earth.  And the best and quickest way to kill religion is to strike at its heart: the See of Peter.  Crétineau-Joly reports some fascinating correspondence where an associate of William Pitt, then Prime Minister of Great Britain, describes an interview he had recently had with the Prime Minister to Cardinal Bernis, a confidante of Pope Pius VI in May, 1794.  You may remember Cardinal Bernis from our discussion of the Suppression of the Jesuits a quarter of a century before.  He was at that time Louis XV of France’s ambassador to the court of Rome in the days of Clement XIV and was a leading player in the plot to suppress the Society of Jesus.  Perhaps he had learned some wisdom in the intervening years.

This correspondence describes the private thinking of Pitt during the dark years of the Convention in France.  The monarchies of Europe were petrified at the anarchy that was taking place in France which had heretofore been looked at as one of the great stable powers of Europe.  And they knew that the revolution was not just about France but rather had its tentacles stretched throughout Europe and was waiting to strike.  And the Holy See and the person of the Pope was the primary target, but the kings were failing in their hour of trial for reasons that we have outlined in many previous posts.  So William Pitt issued through his intermediary this prophetic warning to the Holy See in May, 1794 (translation mine):

The court of Rome is doubtless not ignorant of the fate the Convention has in store for it.  One day or another the Vatican will fall victim to our revolutionaries, and then what will become of the Pope?  I worry little for the Papacy, knowing quite well that it will survive; but the Holy Father is approaching old age; the troubles that overwhelm him can have a deplorable influence on his health.  The holy city occupied or taken by force and the Pope dead, where would the conclave meet?

This idea was doubtless not far from the minds of the revolutionaries in Paris either as later events would show.  They were determined to conquer Rome but in 1794 they couldn’t.  The great Catholic uprising in the Vendée was in that moment occupying the bulk of their military attention.  In addition there was general chaos in Paris where anarchy was prevailing in Robespierre’s government and the streets were running with blood from the guillotine lopping off the heads of everyone who was suspect of being suspect.

William Pitt offered the British Fleet as protection in this case, that they would transport the College of Cardinals to a safe British dependency such as the Balearic Isles in the West Mediterranean where the Conclave could be held.  This is an astounding development and one which the Revolution could not have anticipated.  The official and virulent anti-Catholicism of Great Britain had been a prime influence on the thinking of Voltaire and Pombal in their early days and it was still illegal to be a Catholic in the United Kingdom in 1794.  And here is the prime minister of Great Britain offering to be the Pope’s protector?!!  The French Revolution ended up killing the official anti-Catholicism of Great Britain that had existed since the days of Elizabeth I because if there was anyone the revolution hated as much as the Holy See it was the British government.  The enemy of my enemy is my friend.  After the fall of Napoleon that government, who had been the greatest persecutor of the Catholic Church prior to the Masonic uprising of the 18th century, once again readmitted Catholics to public life for the first time since the 16th century.  So it would seem that, strangely enough, we have Voltaire and Robespierre to thank for Cardinal Newman and Father Faber.  The Lord truly does work in mysterious ways…

In the meantime Cardinal Bernis responded for the Holy Father on June 10, 1794 (translation mine):

The most Holy Father appreciates with great wisdom all the dangers with which he is surrounded; he knows them and has foreseen them for a long time…

Mr. Pitt had the good will to offer him, in case of need, a safe exile under the protection of the British flag.  His Holiness declares that he would accept with happiness this honorable exile and that the Sacred College would follow him with full confidence.  But the Pope believes that he cannot and must not leave the tombs of the holy Apostles save under duress; his irrevocable resolution is to await, at the foot of his crucifix, the enemy coming in the name of the Revolution.

And they would come indeed.

Please go to Confession and pray three Hail Marys in honor of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Posted in The French Revolution | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A meditation on the notion of a republic

July 19, 2016

And it came to pass, that in those days there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that the whole world should be enrolled.  This enrolling was first made by Cyrinus, the governor of Syria.  And all went to be enrolled, every one into his own city.

And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth into Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem: because he was of the house and family of David, to be enrolled with Mary his espoused wife, who was with child.

And it came to pass, that when they were there, her days were accomplished, that she should be delivered.  And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him up in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn (Luke 2:1-7).

The birth of Our Lord as narrated by Saint Luke above arrived at a very interesting moment in human history.  The incredibly expansionist but extremely chaotic Roman Republic had finally dissolved itself when Octavian emerged as victor over Mark Antony in the bloody civil war that closed a third of a century before the Incarnation.  Octavian took the name of Augustus and while he kept the superficial forms of the Republic he established order under his one man rule and that of his successors, and republican government disappeared from the earth.

On the whole the people of the Mediterranean were extremely pleased. Order returned to the world.  Trade flourished and stable communication links and political unity were established from Syria to Spain and from the deserts of Egypt to the borders of Scotland for the first and at present last time in human history.  The incredibly diverse regions of this wide area were no longer to be used as props and supply bases for the armies of feuding Roman republican politicians and had a chance to get to know each other and begin to build the highways by which the Catholic Church would spread.

It was all truly providential and this order established by one man rule that had supplanted the earlier times of chaos and anarchy was a great boon to civilization.  While it would eventually all fall apart as everything made by man must, this idea of a unity of peoples under a common head provided an indispensable foundation in the world for the reception of the Catholic Church.

Even after the collapse of the Empire this form of government would remain throughout the former realm.  The idea of all political and spiritual life culminating in one person was reflective of the order of Heaven revealed by Jesus Christ and preached by the Catholic Church.  And the notion of God as Father was also supposed to be reflected, though usually quite imperfectly, and in some sad cases not at all, in the behavior of kings as this new thing called Christendom was being built.

Christendom was broken apart by the Great Western Schism and the resulting advance of Protestantism a thousand years later and as unbelief advanced over the succeeding centuries the notion of being ruled by a king began to be challenged.  This was all part of the effort to separate man from God.  If the order of Heaven was reflected in stable one man rule with all the pomp and ceremony of monarchy then that had to be done away with.  And what would replace it?

These innovators looked back to the chaos of the Roman Republic and sought to foist it first on the people of France and then the rest of the world.  In the decades prior to the declaration of the French Republic in 1792 the groundwork was laid by people like Jean-Jacques Rousseau crying out that Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains! and Edward Gibbon writing his immense work whose constant underlying theme was that somehow it was the one man rule instituted by Augustus that was the cause of Rome’s decline and fall a half millennium later.  This work, coinciding as it did with the Masonic inspired republican revolt against the British crown in North America, helped to further the fantasy that a return to republican or democratic form of government would bring back Plato and Aristotle and Cato and Cicero from the grave and the world could dispense with Jesus Christ and the Catholic Church, and return to the supposed glories of pagan Greece and Rome.

Well after two centuries now the planet is dominated by democratic republican forms of government.  Where is the golden age that we were promised?  Where are our new Platos and Aristotles?  Nowhere to be found.  It was a fraud from the beginning.  Republics are nothing but chaotic and self destructive oligarchies who defraud their peoples into thinking that just because they slide a piece of paper into a ballot box every few years they somehow rule something.

Republics create factionalism within their societies that exacerbates social passions, breaks internal unity, and eventually tears the society apart.  And remember that factionalism and rebellion were for all of human history considered the worst things that could be visited on a society, but now they are considered virtues.  This form of government only seems long lived when those destructive forces can be channeled outward into expansion as was the case with the Roman Republic or the American Republic, or the European republican empires of the 19th and early twentieth centuries.  And this comes at a cost of being in a more or less constant state of warfare for many lifetimes with all the social disasters that come with that.

While this expansion can be prodigious, as was the case with Rome, the United States, and the global European empires who sought to delineate and carve up for themselves every square inch of the globe, it doesn’t last forever.  And when it ceases all of those destructive forces which had channeled that expansion fall back inward and the result is catastrophic.  Look at the horrible civil wars at the end of the Roman Republic that were finally put an end to by the grace of God preparing the way for the Catholic Church channeled through Octavian, or the horrors that Republican Europe endured during the first half of the twentieth century, or the nightmare that is only now just starting to come to fruition in the United States.

Modern Republicanism was only designed to confuse people and remove the reflection of Heaven on earth that had existed, imperfectly it is true but it was still there, under monarchical form of government.  In short it was instituted not to liberate, but to destroy our societies.

Please go to Confession and say three Hail Marys in honor of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Posted in conspiracy to destroy the teaching of Jesus Christ, The 18th century, The French Revolution | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The murder and expulsion of priests

July 11, 2016                                                                                                                                             The Memorial of Saint Benedict of Nursia

Lets go back a bit to the summer before Louis XVI was murdered.  I was reading something in Jacques Crétinaeu-Joly’s marvelous work L’Église Romaine en Face de la Révolution and a light went off in my brain.  It is merely a footnote wherein Crétineau-Joly reproduces a decree issued by the consul general of the commune of Nantes on the Atlantic Ocean during the September massacres of 1792.  First I’ll give a little a background on the first of what would be many massacres of priests in this miserable epoch we have lived through.

In brief: the nations of Europe were becoming highly concerned about events in France and tried to force the issue and failed.  The Prussians sent their army into France and at first made great headway, advancing toward Paris with the intention of ending the coup d’état and restoring Louis XVI to his rightful place as king.

As they advanced great convulsions occurred within the revolutionary regime.  The National Assembly dissolved itself and was reborn as the National Convention that I mentioned in the last post.  In the interim every opponent of the Masonic coup d’état was branded a traitor to the nation and assaulted.  Groups of fanatics led by Marat (a known Freemason) and Robespierre set on a course of public murder starting on September 2, 1792.

Priests who had refused to take the oath prescribed by the Civil Constitution of the Clergy that would have required them to renounce their fealty to the Roman Pontiff were quite literally thrown to the wolves.  They were ‘tried’ in their prisons and then thrown outside the gate of the prison to a waiting frenzied crowd egged on by fanatics who were hell bent on making sure that their enemies got the blame for the national disaster they themselves had created.  The crowd then hewed them to pieces and the streets ran with the blood of these martyrs.  Thus was born the age of tolerance.

It was in this context that the following decree was issued by the consul general of Nantes on September 6, 1792.  I will offer my own translation of a couple of excerpted paragraphs here (parentheses mine):

The consul, considering that the danger which threatens the fatherland and the misfortunes to which it is today exposed are in part the effect and the result of the criminal maneuvers of the non swearing priests; that it is obvious that these men have sworn the ruin of their fatherland, and that no consideration will ever rally them to the cause of liberty and equality (again no fraternity)

From tomorrow the commissioners (les commissaires, if that word reminds you of another title given by another regime in another place 125 years later) of the three administrations will go to the seminary and to the chateau of Nantes, where the non swearing priests or ecclesiastics of this département are detained who are there either by their own good will or who have been driven there by armed force, and notify them of the law of August 26 (where they were required to swear the oath or face punishment), which decrees their deportation and and enjoin them to be prepared to quit the kingdom in the time fixed by the said law.

The commissioners will make these ecclesiastics understand that the administrators are disposed to follow the literal execution of the decree of of August 26 with regard to them; but that the fermentation of spirits is such that it would be on their part a great imprudence to relocate to the interior and that the safest for them is to prefer the way of the sea (i.e. leave France) to take them any place they wish to fix their domicile.

The commissioners will declare to these ecclesiastics that they must decide within twenty four hours, at the end of which they will come to receive their declarations.  Time presses and their safety would be compromised by a long delay.

This is a threat.  This so called ‘consul general’ is saying to the faithful priests: either get out or we will throw you to the pikes like what happened to your brothers in Paris.  But that was not my thought when I read it.  My thought was that I had seen this before somewhere.  This wasn’t new; in fact it had already happened in another time and a place, but where?  Then I remembered.

Lets think back twenty five years earlier April 2, 1767 when all of the sudden out of nowhere armed royal messengers from the king of Spain, Charles III, arrived at every Jesuit house in his vast realm.  For reasons never explained to them Jesuits of all ages were driven from their houses with nothing but the clothes on their back and a breviary and marched to the sea.  There they were put on ships and after a long ocean journey they were to be unceremoniously dumped on the shore of the Papal States in Italy.

Charles III never made public the reason for this deportation and it was never revealed who planned and organized its method.  It was so well organized and so well planned that it must have had some sort of administrator.  Who was it?  What associations did this person have?  This was in fact the focal point of the whole suppression conspiracy.  The instantaneous annihilation of the Church’s most potent religious order from the whole of the vast Spanish empire.  And now it was being repeated, but being applied to the whole of the French clergy.  Who was behind this?

All those Jesuits being marched to the sea were but a precursor and a foreshadowing.  Not just of what happened in France in 1792, but of the Soviet march to the gulag and the Nazi trains to the death camps and the sadder sight of might have been mothers being goaded into abortion ‘clinics’.  First the Jesuits, then the priests, then the whole Church, then the whole people, then humanity itself.  Or maybe this is all just a coincidence?

Please go to Confession and pray three Hail Marys in honor of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.



Posted in The French Revolution, The Suppression of the Jesuits | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The ten day week and the strangeness of the French Republican calendar

July 5, 2016                                                                                                                                             The Memorial of Saint Anthony Mary Zaccaria

Nine months after the murder of King Louis XVI in the Place de la Révolution and scarcely a week after the murder of his wife Queen Marie Antoinette the revolutionary government of France, the National Convention, adopted a very new and a very strange calendar on October 24, 1793.

The start of this calendar was to be and its reference point was to be September 22, 1792 the day on which the French Republic was declared.  The reference point for that most Catholic of countries would no longer be the birth of Jesus Christ, the advent of the Eternal Word made flesh, the coming of the Divine Redeemer of mankind.  No, it was instead going to be the birthday of that disastrously ill-fated république.

But that was not the strangest part.  The seven day week was abolished.  Instead each month of thirty days was to be divided into three décades.  So in effect instead of seven days the week was now ten, with the tenth being a day of rest and/or government approved worship of human reason or of some unknown unnamed ‘supreme being.’

The implications of this are obvious.  The six days of creation and the seventh day of rest were to be eliminated from human memory.  And the first day of the week the day of the Resurrection, Sunday, was just simply to disappear.  The chief architect of the calendar Charles Gilbert-Romme said as much at the time.  When asked what the object of his calendar was Romme simply replied (The French Revolution, Gaxotte, 1932, p. 329):

To abolish Sunday.

After Napoleon Bonaparte overthrew the revolutionary government and reestablished a still somewhat shaky relationship with the Catholic Church this calendar receded and was finally done away with on January 1, 1806.  But where did it come from?

I recently ran across an image of a pamphlet here published by the Convention in either 1793 or 1794 concerning the republican calendar that may help us to answer that question:

liberty and equality

Note the upside down triangle.  What a curious symbol!  And not one that we would typically associate with the French Revolution.  The equilateral triangle however has been, and remains, a very prominent occult symbol of Freemasonry.

And the words written in the triangle.  The Convention representing the regime followed by two words: liberté and égalité.  But what about fraternité?  It wasn’t there.  The self-contradictory ideals of complete and total personal liberty and complete and total collective equality which cannot coexist; the striving for both of which at the same time causes a society to rip itself to pieces which was then and remains the goal of this conspiracy.

There was no fraternité.  That was added later by the French people when they had to reimagine things to make sense of the crimes that had been committed in their name on their land.  Real brotherhood both within and among nations only comes via the Catholic Church who by her Sacraments and Teaching heals the wounds of fallen man and curbs his passions and worst instincts.

Please go to Confession and say three Hail Marys in honor of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Posted in The French Revolution | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment